MULTICULTURALISM "Political correctness (in reality - cultural Marxism), multiculturalism, radical feminism  and affirmative action have all been shown, by bitter practical experience, to be unworkable by the very class there originators (Marx, Freud, Lukacs, Marcuse and others) had hoped the subjugate - the people.  Oh well, that wasted about eighty years!  But why have these 'isms' caused chaos and heartache on the way through? Well, they don't work. And unworkable systems eventually fall apart and we humans revert to what does work!  Family, tribe, nation, trust, honesty and shared responsibilty. " Lyn Vickery "A nation comprised of incompatible, divided, tension building, cultures and values is a nation divided against itself and must therefore be inherently weak and unstable."  Lyn Vickery. "History tells us that every nation that embraced multiculturalism (under whatever name or guise) eventually crumbled.  Even mighty empires have succumbed to this divisive gnawing internal cancer.  Take for example ancient Rome,  the British Empire or even the former Soviet Union.  When the hoards were incorporated or when they flooded in to the homelands (eager the share in the benefits of these great empires) they didn't value add ... they bled them dry and weakened and destroyed them from within.  Where is mighty Rome or Great Britain today?"  Lyn Vickery "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear." - Marcus Tullius Cicero, 42 BC "GLOBAL ACTION opposes multiculturalism. We agree with the growing world view that multiculturalism is, like Marxist communism, one of the twentieth century's great failed experiments.  Our established national cultural heritage and the will of the people that proudly comprise Australia takes precedence over divisive imported political or religious notions, private agendas and tired theories about both multiculturalism and political correctness such as those espoused by the Frankfurt School - an institute for Marxism in Germany funded by Felix Weil in 1923 (http://www.freecongress.org/PC_Essays/).  We are Australian realists and patriots, not poisonous foreign scammers, cultural marxists and polico/academic dreamers who seek to create ungovernable mental and physical ghettos in our land." Lyn Vickery. "There have been distinct and separate tribes and nations since the dawn of history.  Ancient prophecy tells us that at the end of time it will be the same.   Only a fool would think to change history over a few decades... and that's not to say that the fools and manipulators aren't trying very hard right now.  Variety and cultural differences in different nations and regions are what make the world dynamic and interesting. What a boring grey place it would be if we humans were all brown, believed the same things, ate the same food, dressed the same ..."  Lyn Vickery. "If the peddlers of extremist and even mainstream Islam continue to pursue their present dark course a clash of civilizations will result that will make all the bloodletting of the crusades look like a morning at play school - and when the dust has settled Islam will have been exposed and obliterated."  Lyn Vickery. SEE LINKS OR FULL ARTICLES BELOW:    http://www.louisbeam.com/Multicul.htm         http://www.multiculturalbunk.com POSITION ON MULTICULTURALISM GENERAL COMMENTS National cultural harmony and advancement is a matter of mutual respect and a decent attitude one to another. As a nation we have gained immeasurably from the contributions of the people of many nations. Ours is one of the most progressive peaceful and best balanced of any mixed culture society in the world.  GLOBAL  ACTION (AUSTRALIA) will defend the mix as it is now and will not tolerate a flood of immigration from any region of the world that would upset the present balance. GLOBAL ACTION INTERNATIONAL supports and encourages the right of all individuals and private groups to peacefully preserve their cultural heritage utilizing their own group's resources. GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) supports AUSTRALIA FOR AUSTRALIANS and this means putting our common values above values drawn from our various INDIVIDUAL cultural and religious backgrounds.  GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) will not see this nation divided - especially on cultural or religious grounds - see ISLAM. GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) will strongly support a media campaign to promote pride in being Australian first and putting Australian values first. GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) supports the incorporation of compatible ideas, values, methodologies and the like, where they value add to the nation and the people. Where multiculturalism causes stress, social strife and dissension or where ethnic communities harbor criminal elements, terrorists or religious zealots GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) vigorously opposes it. GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) will actively oppose the further spread of Islamic teachings in the nation.  Australia is not an Islamic nation and the vast majority of our people abhor the world wide trend by which Islamic teachings are radicalized wherever they are spread.  We never had an Islamic problem in the past.  The people never voted or asked for it and so GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) will not allow it to spread. "When in Rome, do as the Romans do!"  Australians quite rightly will not be dictated to by a minority of newcomers who want to milk all the benefits of this culture while at the same time refusing to give up their incompatible, negative foreign traditions. GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) says: These people can live as Australians do, or they are free to leave. NOTE#  Those people who live in Australia and who practice Islam peacefully and lawfully will not in any way be persecuted of disadvantaged by GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA). They may carry on their faith in peace and without fear under a "live and let live" policy. PEOPLE WHO DO NOT FIT IN  - TROUBLE MAKERS/DETAINEE ADVOCATES/LAWYERS/RADICALS More recently we have witnessed the burning of detention centers  by detainees, (Damage bill over 8 million dollars to the Australian tax payer) most of whom have already had their applications rejected. GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) will not play this game. The Australian people will not be cynically misled conned or ripped off by these troublemakers or their supporters in Australia anymore.  Imagine what these detainees would do if we allowed them out into our community! GLOBAL ACTION (AUSTRALIA) will instantly deport any would be refugees who flout the system  - zero tolerance.  In addition refugees granted permanent residency in this country over the last fifteen years may count it a privilege and should they break the law on any matters pertaining to political, terrorist, religious, financial, public agitation or incitement issues they will have their refugee residency or citizenship claims revoked and they too must be deported immediately. The vast bulk of the Australian people are also heartily sick and tired of do gooders, lawyers and so called refugee activists and advocates. Those deemed to be troublemakers will be warned to desist.  If they continue to agitate and cause dissension in the community, such that it costs the public (as happened with the detention center riots fires and breakouts) they will be liable to prosecution to the full extent of the law. ________________________________________________________________ As a point of interest - The term "melting pot" has never been American policy, it is a term created by an anti-White racist jewish playwright, Israel Zangwill:  His play The Melting Pot was a hit in the USA  in 1908-1909. #  The following articles do not represent the officially stated position of Global Action,  but are included here to inform and broaden the important debate on multi-culturalism. - Lyn Vickery                  Following Article: from http://www./www.multiculturalbunk.com                  Titled:    The central absurdities of multiculturalism. Prof Parekh, author of "Rethinking Multiculturalism", said with commendable honesty that "the multicultural movement ..... has so far failed to throw up a coherent philosophical statement of its central principles".   It is good to see a sociologist aware of the need for "central principles" or "general theories":   second nature to physicists and chemists. To help plug this gap, the remaining paragraphs of this site are an attempt to set out the "central principles" of multiculturalism, or rather the absurdity of multiculturalism.   Numbers refer to relevant sections above. Over the last three hundred years or so, technology has brought a million fold improvement in access to culture, both native and foreign culture.  The average person now has instant access to a million pieces of music played by the World's top musicians, a million books, several billion web sites, a hundred different plays, documentaries etc every night on television, and so on.  Compared to this, multiculturalism is irrelevant. The word "diversity" as an euphemism for multicultural is devious alteration to the English language.   Its main purpose is as a semi technical sounding word designed to impress.  When two or more cultures merge, the enrichment that takes place tends to be temporary because human memories are limited.  For example the average person uses around five thousand words, thus merging two languages will ultimately lead to a new hybrid language, which has no more words that the two originals: five thousand.  The new hybrid culture may or may not be an improvement on the originals - depending on the extent to which the hybrid adopts the best of the two originals.  Even if the hybrid is an improvement, it is debatable as to whether the World as a whole has been culturally enriched, since one or more cultures have been lost in order to create the hybrid. Worthwhile or valuable culture travels on its own, that is without the need for migrants. Thus the culture that comes with migrants is low grade culture. In other words multicultural culture is low grade culture. The advocates of multiculturalism have learned from Goebbles's dictum: "Never tell a small lie." One of the fundamental ideas behind multiculturalism is that physical proximity to members of another culture is needed to learn from them. This is unmitigated nonsense: even the advocates of multiculturalism dont make this claim in respect of types of culture other than multicultural culture. The idea that no culture is better than any other culture is a strange one: migrants obviously don’t agree with this. Cultures are as likely to adopt each other's worst aspects as to adopt each other's best aspects. The popular claim that multiculturalism makes us "vibrant" and "dynamic" is not supported by history or the evidence generally. There are plenty of examples of racially pure, yet successful countries. There is a wealth of evidence that the advocates of multiculturalism do not really believe in it: they advocate it because it is fashionable or politically correct.  For example Western advocates of multiculturalism advocate it for the West, but are indifferent to the gross lack of multiculturalism in various large Asian countries.  They claim to be concerned about culture, but gloss over the fact that technology has given us a vastly greater access to culture than multiculturalism.(2) Multiculturalists tend to believe that new = good. That combined with their tendency to see the short term but not the long term makes multiculturalists a banal, naïve bunch of folk. The self contradictions by multiculturalists make it difficult to know what the central merits of multiculturalism are supposed to be.  Ethnic cuisine is much the largest cultural effect of post WWII immigrants to the UK. Quantifying this is difficult, but if one goes on the purely economic effects, the economic benefits of ethnic cuisine are a total irrelevance compared to another piece of cultural transfer: the adoption of Western technology by China and India. Moreover, the latter occurs largely without multiculturalism, that is, without migration from Europe or the US to China or India. The most vociferous advocates of multiculturalism are society's loudmouths: journalists and politicians.  In contrast, academics are relatively non-committal on the subject. Multiculturalists' claim to be concerned about the variety of clothing is suspicious: in the UK they never mourned the loss of the bowler hat or the Northern working man's cloth cap.  We are often told that "every country is multicultural now". This is nonsense in the case of China and to a lesser extent Japan and India. Ultimate conclusion:  The claims made for multiculturalism do not stand inspection. Multiculturalism is an irrelevance. ________________________________________________________________ Article:  How we became a land of ghettos  - Canada Published: Monday, June 12, 2006 Robert Fulford, National Post The problem of Muslim radicalization has been on the agenda of all nations since 9/11. But Canada faces a unique dilemma because the doctrine of multiculturalism is seen as intrinsic to our national identity. The recent disruption of an alleged homegrown Islamist terror plot has caused many Canadians to ask: How can multiculturalism -- which preaches tolerance above all else -- be squared with a militant, intolerant creed that demonizes non-believers? This week, the National Post presents a week-long series of articles examining this question. In today's first instalment, Robert Fulford examines the origins of multiculturalism -- and concludes the doctrine's problems go well beyond the encouragement of Muslim extremism. The arrest of a group of Canadian Muslims accused of plotting terrorist attacks in Toronto has thrown a shadow over a favourite monument of Canadianism: multiculturalism. Whatever the fate of the suspects, this cherished concept is suddenly up for grabs. A little more than 30 years ago, Canada changed its approach to the question of absorbing immigrants. We had traditionally believed in old-fashioned pluralism: people of different sorts maintaining independent cultural traditions, but living side by side in an integrated society. The vast expansion of immigration in the 1970s seemed to call for a new system, however. In the Trudeau era, we chose to define our society as a patchwork of many culturally distinct groups that may or may not interact. The word we used to describe this new, more balkanized model -- multiculturalism -- is harmless on its face: No reasonable Canadian opposes the right of immigrants to respect their homeland cultures and retain aspects of their pre-Canada lives. But Canada has gone beyond that. Multiculturalism has become a way of putting people in narrow categories. Some groups have decided to live in ghettos of their own making, apart from the rest of us. While living apart temporarily often is a necessary part of the immigration process, if only because of language, those who see cultural isolation as a permanent way of life tend to cripple their own possibilities, limit their ability to contribute to Canada, and create impregnable communities in which they can nourish their imported grievances and generate hatred for democracy and the West. How did we get to this point? A good starting point is the recent autobiography of Manoly R. Lupul, The Politics of Multiculturalism: A Ukrainian-Canadian Memoir. In the 1960s, after Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson assigned the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism to design a fresh approach to English-French relations, citizens whose origins were neither British nor French began to fear they were being excluded from a new version of citizenship. Ukrainian-Canadians, in particular, feared the extinction of Ukrainian uniqueness. Their homeland, part of the Soviet Union, was dominated from Moscow. Lupul, visiting Ukraine in the late 1960s, saw Moscow's Russification policy destroying the old way of life. (He had no idea that the Soviet Union would fall apart in the 1990s and leave Ukraine to its own devices.) He and others dreamt of helping Ukraine survive in Canada. The founder of the University of Alberta's Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Lupul in 1971 helped draft Alberta's first legislation allowing for the teaching of Ukrainian and other desired "third languages." By 1972, Ottawa had a minister responsible for multiculturalism and in 1973 a Multiculturalism Directorate. Other groups were involved, but Ukrainians remained influential. It is a little known fact, even among multiculturalism's loudest boosters: Lupul helped shape constitutional change. The crucial year was 1982, when, after much lobbying, multiculturalism made its way into the Charter of Rights and Freedoms through Section 27, which states: "This Charter shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians." That was the multicultural movement's greatest political victory. It meant that multiculturalism could be a factor at all levels of government and the courts. In the 1950s, Prime Minister John Diefenbaker (whose own background was partly German) claimed all Canadians should be treated alike and denounced the idea of "hyphenated Canadians." Less than 30 years later, the government of Canada provided millions of citizens with their own hyphens. For many, especially ethnic-group leaders and politicians who sought their support, official multiculturalism was the ideal approach to an increasingly diverse country. Few suspected that in two decades, this process would produce young Canadians who neither understood nor respected the institutions that had made Canada a desirable immigrant destination. The most enthusiastic celebrant was an academic, Will Kymlicka, a Queen's University professor of political philosophy. In his 1998 book, Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada, Kymlicka declared that "Canada does better than virtually any other country in the world in the integration of immigrants." Multiculturalism was the reason, because it made explicit the principle "that the interests and lifestyles of immigrants are as worthy of respect (and accommodation) as those of the people descended from the country's original colonists." Smug confidence encouraged proponents of multiculturalism to overplay their hand. In 1994, for instance, the Writers' Union of Canada, possibly overeager to conform with official policy, staged a federally funded conference in Vancouver for "First Nations Writers and Writers of Colour" -- and no one else. That no-whites-allowed policy illustrated the ugly side of multiculturalism. A Globe and Mail editorial claimed the event proved multiculturalism was "intended to nourish and sustain the differences that come with open immigration." As a result of 9/11, and the surging Islamist threat it signalled, multiculturalism is now viewed with greater skepticism -- not just in Canada, but in Europe as well. Necla Kelek, a Turkish-born German sociologist, has studied the lives of Turkish women in Germany. In April, at a PEN conference in New York, she said that Turkish Muslim migrants had started out 40 years earlier from secularized Turkey and ended up living as pre-modern, pre-secular Muslims in Germany. After all these years, she said, the 2.5-million Turks have "not yet arrived in Germany." In the German cities, Turkish families now inhabit their own districts, "a parallel world," separate from the Germans. While there are different forms of Islam, in Germany one point binds them all: "the Muslim woman ... in the way she wears the scarf and the chador." Eight or nine decades ago, Turkey took pride in the emerging public role of women. But in Germany, Turkish women retreated into the home. Few who have observed Islam's practice in Canada will find the Kelek analysis surprising. Our society needs to re-imagine multiculturalism and above all needs to emphasize, far more than we have done in recent years, the principles by which we run our society -- the principles that differentiate us from all those places to which no one would ever want to migrate. One principle is the separation of religion from political power; anyone who rejects that idea cannot be taken seriously as a participant in the Canadian tradition. We should also make it clear that in Canada a religion achieves legitimacy only when its adherents respect the spiritual values of others. Salim Mansur, a Muslim professor of political science at the University of Western Ontario, wrote in the Toronto Sun on Saturday: "We [Canadian Muslims] preach tolerance yet we are intolerant. We demand inclusion, yet we practise exclusion of ... those with whom we disagree." In what he called a "brutally honest" response to this month's events, Mansur argued that "We have made hypocrisy an art, and have spun for ourselves a web of lies that blinds us to the real world around us." Religious freedom becomes a very pale idea when used to assert a belief in one true way and contempt for other beliefs. In this unhappy season, we need substantial criticism of multiculturalism and a redefinition of what it means. On these issues, we should look for a much better and more candid performance from our political leadership, from the media (which too willingly accept ghettoization), and from the various religious and ethnic groups in Canada. Perhaps we have to begin by admitting that over 30 years we have made some grave mistakes. robert.fulford@utoronto.ca _____________________________________________________________ Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer The Layman's Primer by Louis Beam No nation is born multicultured. Multiculturalism is an unnatural as well as unhealthy condition that can only afflict states in national decline. A multicultural state carries in it's geneses the seeds of eventual national destruction. All multicultural nations will be found to be in a state of political, moral, economic and social decay. Greed and corruption will characterize the government coupled with oppressive measures directed against citizens. Lies and deceit will be stock and trade of media, politicians, and educational institutions. Such are the bellwethers of a multiculturalist advent. In modern times multiculturalism is instituted from the top down as an elitist ruling class tool used to play one or more racial or ethnic groups against another. The ensuing cultural melee serves the political designs, economic goals and power needs of elitist rulers and their sponsors. This technique was developed by Marxist ideologues who used multiculturalism in Russia to divide and conquer resistance to the institution of a communist state. The end result of their successful takeover was the murder of thirty million humans in the Soviet Union alone. Many more elsewhere. The same internationalist cabals who sponsored Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin as the multicultural leaders of the Soviet state from their banking houses in New York, similarly sponsor the multicultural leaders of the United States, Canada, and Europe today. An interlocking network of foundations such as Ford and Carnegie, international banking empires such as Rockefeller and Rothschild, and government agencies firmly in their control work in tandem with controlled propaganda outlets such as the New York Times, CBS, and Hollywood, to promote, foster, and institute multiculturalism today. While the examples used in this essay deal primarily with the United States the same process with the same methods is being employed elsewhere. This of itself is prima facie evidence of a cabal which promotes multiculturalism as a tool to achieve its objectives. Multiculturalism is being used as a hammer to forge the compliant people who will compose the obedient states of the New World Order. As a weapon of post modern political warfare multiculturalism has few equals, which, thus explains its use currently against all of Western Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Deliberate fragmentation of these nations and the resultant loss of national identity and purpose into politically disharmonious units, serves as a stepping stone to world government. And who will compose that world government? A ruling class consisting of an "economic hierarchy" that replaces the philosophy of the nineteenth century "natural hierarchy." A force that views countries and the people that live in them first as economic targets to be exploited, and second as military targets to be defeated if they resist. One must not let himself be confused by the window dressing of willing dupes from the left who are most often, but not always, seen as the spokesmen for the glories of multiculturalism. Liberal supporters of multiculturalism amount to nothing more than opportunist parasites riding on the back of a social fungus attacking the body politic. While some incoherent liberals have been spokesmen for multiculturalism, they should not be viewed as representing other main stream liberals any more so than do so-called conservatives like Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich speak for constitutionalists and populists. The real stimulus, unseen elitist who promote multiculturalism as a tool of warfare, are themselves anything but liberal, progressive, or democratic. Rather they are global social tyrants who seek more power, more wealth, and more control over people--and they could care less what the politics are of those they seek to rule. Elitists schemers envision a dictatorial world government composed of forcibly federated states, which, properly speaking, are police states without borders. The United Nations will serve as the store house front and public face of those who from behind the scenes manipulate world events. Economically envisioned is a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Stalin did for his miserable workers. Vassal states are to produce goods and insure compliance of their subjects by defining all opposition to the borderless police state as terrorism. Thus will be the good times. In bad times, when elitist multinational corporations are unable to maintain control, the armed might of NATO will be used to enforce obedience by non-compliant states. METHODS USED AND THEIR EFFECT Just as television commercials are run by those who will profit from their airing, multiculturalism is fostered upon a country by its sponsors who intend to benefit from its acceptance. Those who sponsor multiculturalism are properly called multiculturalists and generally will be found to be those people with the least amount of personal culture appertaining to them. As a dying tree drops its leaves and is attacked by fungus and worms of decay, so to is a nation set upon by multiculturalists. The dominate culture is attacked from all sides. This is not so much a product of maliciousness as necessity. By vilifying, leveling, and weakening the dominant culture, an environment is created for social, political, and economic turmoil which produces change that will benefit the sponsors of a multiculturalist state. If the government and news media relentlessly pursue issues of race, gender, and diversity in preference to the real issues that need to be addressed, there will be an increasing division of society along the same lines. Which is exactly what the sponsors of multiculturalism want. Social instability, caused by a steady erosion of standards and values, coupled with a scramble over dwindling economic opportunities by conflicting ethnic groups, produces precisely the alienation and conflict needed to implement a multicultural state. Further, the lack of common standards and values leads to personal disorganization, resulting in unsociable behavior. This is the life support system of a multicultural state. In a word: anomie. As a political tool multiculturalism has several applications. It is used to prevent a national consensus among the electorate. The confluence of divergent life views, cultures, beliefs, religions, ethnic habits, etc. insures a swirling river of discontent upon which the multiculturalist rides. It is a perfect method of ensuring that there can never in the future be accord, unity, and a common agreed upon destiny among those ruled. Multiculturalism represents a basic form of divide and conquer, to the benefit of corrupt government and its sponsors. Multiculturalism is likewise a financial tool used to socially and economically level a targeted population. When implemented, it becomes in fact a battle over scarce resources and shrinking economic opportunities, with government weighing in on the side of cheap labour. A continual flow of impoverished workers is insured through immigration (both legal and illegal), who by working for less compensation continually drive wages down. For the vast majority of citizens the standard of living will not increase, but rather constantly decrease. As a general rule: The amount of multiculturalism in any society is directly proportional to the corruption at the top of a political system and inversely proportional to national unity. This means: multiculturalism will have succeeded in so much as the country has failed. Multiculturalism can further be used as "transitional tool" to take a targeted population from one form of government to another. When a political condition of greed, massive corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of drugs, violence, and discontent, therein exists the perfect environment for governmental change to a system that more closely serves long term interests of ruling elitists. Seeing that both the problem and solution are provided by the same people makes the CIA's importation of some one hundred billion dollars worth of cocaine and other drugs into the United States understandable. While at the same time explaining FBI, ATF, and other, more secretive federal government agencies involvement in domestic terrorism or its cover-up. Suddenly, that which erroneously was previously thought to be unrelated events show their common thread and purpose. Within the deleterious milieu of multiculturalism exists the propaganda opportunity for re-education of the people into a more malleable entity. A targeted population will be shaped mentally by new forms of public education in the schools, media indoctrination, and by elitist pronouncements. Thus placed in a crucible of economic necessity and social pressure, once free citizens become despondent masses, adjusting to and accepting fundamentally changing national circumstances as a matter of expedient survival. For the reticent, conformity by force will ensue in the form of legal penalties disguised as ant-drug, anti-terrorism, or anti-hate laws. All of this leading toward what George Orwell so aptly predicted in his book 1984: "Almost certainly we are moving into an age of totalitarian dictatorships. An age in which freedom of thought will be at first a deadly sin and later on a meaningless abstraction." A society is being spawned where those with the most unsociable behavior, deviant lifestyle, or personal failures are given the most by government. This is no accident! It is not government blundering, nor is it misguided liberalism; it is exactly what it is by design, purpose, and objective. A program advocated by both Republican and Democratic administrations for the elitist backers of both are the same. It is the program of a government which has fallen firmly into the hands of evil forces. Failure to recognize this salient point will result in endlessly chasing after tangents, or needlessly blaming those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Anger directed toward liberals, Blacks, or people of colour is wasted. Reorganization of the government from the bottom up would be productive. Multiculturalism, like drugs, is an insidious weapon. Both destroy the heart and fabric of a people. All ties to family, community, and one's people as a whole are destroyed by these two opiates of the human mind. Both are sponsored from the top down by one world elitists bent upon creating a world order who's power is such that its subjects posses no potential for resistance. By its very nature every emerging police state seeks to harness both the power of the state and the people to its will. When calls are made for support of cryptic slogans such as war on crime, drugs, terrorism, hate, poverty, etc. what is really meant is "grant power to the state and applaud the rape of your freedom." In sum: multiculturalism is another program designed to create the subjects of a Police State Without Borders. When coupled with the "war on drugs" and "war on terrorism," Orwell's world of endless war is realized. It would be their world, their orders, and nothing new, for a lust for despotism is as old as mankind himself. The anti-thesis of multiculturalism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity among the people of a nation. Belief in one's self and the ultimate good of his people. A cohesiveness that produces a national vision, with set boundaries of acceptability and unacceptability in the affairs of a nation, while allowing for the natural differences in men. Multiculturalism as a tool of warfare becomes impotent and rejected in such an environment. A necessary first step toward recovery is to look at politics, social policy, and government emanating from Washington D.C. with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of   false information and deception propagated by elitist sponsors. Pretending any longer that the bought and paid for political prostitutes in Washington D.C. represent you or anyone you know is tantamount to cutting your own wrist with a razor blade. Self-destructive behavior may qualify one for government "protected class status" under diversity laws--but it will not save you, your family, or your nation. America, Canada, and most of Europe are ruled by politicians about whom the best that can be said is that they are men of ill repute, each out to loot the state. One thing is clear, the American ruling elite of today are far closer in ideological viewpoint to world government ruled by a privileged few than it is to the world of the American Revolution or the Constitutional Convention of 1789. Yet still, the spirit of 1776 lives on in this land. For once again rebellion to tyrants in obedience to God is afoot. Listen closely and in the distance you can hear the ring of  liberty's bell calling gallant sons and noble daughters to her aid. They know no left, nor right, only treason. And they will not fear to answer. Let tyrants tremble. And though the heavens fall, let there be justice. Courtesy of  Louis Beam _________________________________________ Also see:      IMMIGRATION      ISLAM      RACIALISM JOIN GLOBAL ACTION DONATE NOW TO GLOBAL ACTION GIVE US YOUR FEEDBACK    issues@globalactint.com

  VOLUNTEER     |     DONATE      |        HOME